I think Fund performance tables are completely flawed. Here’s why: - Ranmore

I think Fund performance tables are completely flawed. Here’s why:

I

The usual table shows 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 years.

Assume a 10 yr old fund & equal return p/a – park compounding for now.

The latest year’s performance contributes:

100% of the 1st column
33% of the 2nd – 3yrs
20% of the 3rd – 5 yrs
14% of the 4th – 7yrs
10% of the 10th – 10yrs

Whereas the 1 yr performance 10 years ago, contributes 0% of the 1, 3, 5, & 7 year columns.

And only 10% of the 10 yr column, yet it’s also the performance of one of the 10 years?

Meaning the latest year’s performance = a 36% weighted contribution to the table vs 1 year performance of 10 years ago = 2% weighted contribution (10% contribution to 1 column of 5).

A blowout recent year skews this even more.

Conclusion – these tables are massively weighted to recent performance.

So how predictive is 1yr performance?

Most funds track benchmarks, so here’s a scatter plot over 30 years of 1-year perf of MSCI World (x-axis) & subsequent 1-year perf (y-axis), and it has an R2 of 0.003.

So zero predictability, same for 3 & 5yrs.

Is your best chance to buy when 1-year performance has been absolutely terrible?

Or just buy what makes sense.

Source: Bloomberg, MSCI

This website is directed only at, and contains information about products and services only available to, those who are Professional Clients or Eligible Counterparties as defined by the UK Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA"). Please read our disclaimer carefully before entering the website as it explains certain legal and regulatory restrictions applicable to the investment services Ranmore Fund Management provides.

Read Disclaimer here